THE ROGER C. WILSON LAW FIRM, PC
  • HOME
  • Our Firm
    • LOCATION/DIRECTIONS
  • Our People
    • ROGER C. WILSON
    • FRANCES L. SPINELLI
    • ANGELA STROUGAL
    • SARA J. WILSON
  • Our Practice
    • BUSINESS LITIGATION
    • CRIMINAL DEFENSE / GOVERNMENT ENFOREMENT >
      • Drug Cases
      • White Collar
      • RICO
      • Regulatory Offenses
      • Firearms Offenses
      • DUI
    • CIVIL LITIGATION
    • APPELLATE

July 27th, 2018

7/27/2018

0 Comments

 

TWO ATLANTA BUSINESSMEN SENTENCED EACH TO A DECADE IN PRISON IN FEDERAL SECURITIES FRAUD CASE; WILSONLAW CLIENT SENTENCED TO 24 MONTHS IN SAME CASE

Picture

www.ajc.com/news/local/doj-two-metro-atlanta-men-convicted-million-fraud-scheme/H6MJ5ITBIEuYS4VaCpjRUL/?icmp=np_inform_variation-control
Two metro-Atlanta businessmen, William Goldstein and Marc Bercoon, were sentenced each to ten years in prison this week after their convictions for securities fraud and related crimes in federal court in Atlanta.  A third defendant in the case, Peter Veugeler, was represented by The Roger C. Wilson Law Firm, PC, which negotiated a resolution of the case for him with prosecutors before trial.  As a result of that resolution, Wilson client, Mr. Veugeler, was sentenced to 24 months, two days after the other sentencings.  United States v. Marc Bercoon, et al. 1:15-CR-00022 (US Dist Ct ND Ga).   
 
Atlanta entrepreneur Goldstein and his business colleague, and Atlanta lawyer, Bercoon, were convicted by a federal jury in February of twelve counts of conspiracy, securities fraud, mail fraud, and wire fraud.  Pursuant to the resolution of the case for him, Mr. Veugeler pled guilty to a single conspiracy count.  All three men were charged in connection with several groups of transactions in which newly issued stock of a formerly private company was sold to public investors on the over-the-counter market.  The indictment charged that the men illegally marketed and sold the shares, in ways improperly designed to increase the demand for and sale prices of the stock.  Prosecutors asserted losses of well over $4 million, although that amount was challenged by all three defendants and ultimately was determined by the Court to be significantly lesser.
 
Common sense might suggest that for a company selling its stock into the public market, doing so in ways that would increase the demand for and trading prices of the stock (and thus of the money raised by the equity financing) would be not only an acceptable but also a universal approach.    But however common it may be, prosecutors charged that the transactions in this case violated the federal prohibition of so-called “manipulative trading” under the federal securities laws.  That prohibition is very broad and applies to share placement and trading practices that have the intent and result of affecting the trading price or volume of the stock, or of giving an inaccurate impression of a broader interest or activity in the stock than actually exists.
 
Roger C. Wilson practices extensively in the area of federal white collar criminal defense.  He has represented numerous persons charged with a variety of financial crimes, including securities fraud, bank fraud, and loan and mortgage fraud, in negotiating resolutions of the charges and in representing such persons at trial.
0 Comments

July 22nd, 2018

7/22/2018

0 Comments

 

 
ALL CHARGES DISMISSED AGAINST DEFENDANT LATE IN FEDERAL BRIBERY TRIAL UPON DISCOVERY THAT FBI AGENT GAVE FALSE TESTIMONY BEFORE THE GRAND JURY

Picture
Late in a federal bribery trial in Birmingham, Alabama, just before the case went to the jury, all charges were dismissed against one of the three defendants after it was uncovered that an FBI agent had lied in her testimony before the federal grand jury that produced the indictments leading to the trial.
 
The dismissed defendant, Steven McKinney, was one of three men on trial in a federal prosecution contending that they had sought to bribe a former Alabama state legislator in connection with the potential liability of a corporation client for environmental violations.  At the time, McKinney and one of the other two defendants were lawyers for a large, prominent Birmingham-based law firm, Balch & Bingham.  The third defendant was an executive of the client company involved, the Drummond Company.  All three were alleged to have sought to bribe the former legislator to assist them in negotiations with environmental regulators on behalf of the company client.
 
THE GRAND JURY PROCESS
 
The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution mandates that no person may be charged with a felony except by indictment for it by a grand jury.  The operation of grand juries in the federal system is governed by Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.  Grand juries (comprised of between 16 and 23 members) meet in secret and receive and consider evidence and arguments provided to them by prosecutors in deciding whether to charge (“indict”) a person being targeted by the prosecutors in the grand jury proceedings.  If the grand jury (by a vote of at least 12 of the grand jurors) decides to indict the person (and grand juries almost always do when requested to) then the person is charged with the crime, and ultimately faces a trial on the charges before a regular jury.  All testimony before grand juries is given under oath.  If a person testifies falsely under oath to a grand jury, the person is susceptible to being prosecuted for perjury.
 
THE BIRMINGHAM CRIMINAL TRIAL
 
 During the Birmingham jury trial, one of principal FBI agents in the case admitted that she had testified falsely to the grand jury in obtaining the indictment of the three men, at least with respect to McKinney.   The agent had testified to the grand jury that all three men had met with the legislator in advance of a meeting with state regulators.  However, on cross examination by McKinney’s lawyer in the jury trial, the agent admitted that she had no evidence that McKinney had ever met with the legislator.  Apparently as a direct result of this revelation by McKinney’s counsel, the Judge dismissed McKinney from the case, likely under Rule 29 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which provides a mechanism for the charges against a defendant to be dismissed at the end of the government’s case, or later before jury deliberations begin, either by motion of the defense lawyer or by the court on its own initiative.

McKinney will not be susceptible to being re-prosecuted by the government, because of the nature and timing of the dismissal of the charges against him.

However, after the dismissal of him the trial continued, to jury deliberations and verdict, for both of the other two defendants, who reportedly did attend the meetings with the state legislator.  The jury found both of those other two defendants guilty of all charges.


Here are local media reports on the events:

www.al.com/news/birmingham/index.ssf/2018/07/charges_dropped_against_one_ba.html

www.al.com/news/birmingham/index.ssf/2018/07/verdict_reached_in_federal_bri.html
0 Comments

May 22nd, 2018

5/22/2018

0 Comments

 


THE NEW FEDERAL FINANCIAL CRIME OF “SPOOFING”:  EVEN ON THE SCORECARDS APPROACHING ROUND THREE; LESSONS FOR THE FUTURE?

Picture
By Roger C. Wilson*
     © 2018 The Roger C. Wilson Law Firm, PC, Atlanta Georgia
 
After the first jury trials in prosecutions for a new federal financial crime - “spoofing” - the score is even as between the Government and defendants.  The litigation experience to date provides possible instruction and strategy roadmaps for lawyers handling future spoofing cases and other cases involving similar alleged financial crimes.
 
The crime of “spoofing”, applicable to commodities trading, was created by the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010 (new section 4c(a)(5)(C) of the Commodity Exchange Act -- (7 U.S.C. §  6c(a)(5)(C)).  (Termed “spoofing” in the new statute, it is also referred to as “layering”.)   Basically, it is the placing of buy or sell orders for commodities with the intention that the orders will not be completed.  The new law targets situations in which such orders are placed solely to affect market price and in the commodity, so that the person placing the orders then can benefit from the resulting price moves by conducting actual trades at the  new prices.
 
The spoofing prohibition is one part of the larger targeting of “market manipulation”, also applicable (by other statutes) to the trading of stocks as well as to commodities.
 
 In late 2016 the first spoofing case went to trial in Chicago against New Jersey resident, Michael Coscia, on twelve charges of spoofing and commodities fraud. (For each of six transactions targeted in the indictment, Coscia was charged with both spoofing, under 7 U.S.C. §§ 6c(a)(5)(C) and 13(a)(2), and criminal commodities fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1348.)  1:14-CR-00551 (N.D. Ill).  In a dramatic opening success for the Government, the jury took barely an hour to find Coscia guilty on all counts.
 
New indictments and cases followed the initial success.  A few weeks ago the second case went to trial, this one against a UBS trader, Andre Flotron. 3:17-CR-00220 (D. Conn.).  Equally dramatically, in that second trial the jury took not much longer than an hour to find Flotron not guilty.  To complete the drama, just after the Flotron acquittal, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to consider Coscia’s appeal of his conviction.
 
Thus, the score is now 1 to 1 for the Government and defense, and the Supremes are not getting involved.  Defense lawyers in future trials will be anxious to identify and utilize any lessons or strategies that may be available from these two opening trials.


Read More
0 Comments

GUN STORE OWNER PREEMPTS GOVERNMENT RAID

3/15/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
Nicely demonstrating smart, creative, proactive lawyering in the criminal defense context, an attorney representing a California gun store owner has preemptively obtained a federal court order forbidding the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms to carry out a threatened raid of the owner's store, Ares Armor, to confiscate products and customer information.  ATF had demanded that the business owner disclose information and records concerning all customers who had bought so-called “80% lower receivers” from the store.  These are small parts that can be combined with numerous other parts to assemble a finished firearm.  The parts are not considered firearms and neither they nor their sale is illegal, provided they are manufactured to specifications prescribed by ATF.  Reportedly, the versions possessed and being sold by Ares did not meet those specifications, and therefore ATF demanded to seize not only the Ares inventory, but also Ares’s customers information.  Ares was willing to hand over the inventory but refused to provide information on its customers, which it said would violate the privacy rights of the customers and Ares.  The Ares owner alleges that ATF agents threatened that if he did not turn over all such information, the agents would raid all his stores and bring criminal charges against him and his staff, effectively destroying his business.

It was in response to the asserted Government threat that Ares sought a temporary restraining order (TRO) prohibiting the ATF from carrying out the threat.  A U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of California granted the order requested by Ares.  The TRO will remain in place to protect Ares until a forthcoming hearing on whether that protection will be made more permanent.

Seeking to restrain the threatened raid by the federal agency means of a preemptive TRO is a creative, and so far here, effective, method of preemptively protecting one’s Constitutional rights against an imminent threat to them by Government authorities in the course of a purported criminal investigation.  The legal standards for extending that protection to a longer-term basis (in the form of a temporary or permanent injunction) are greater than those for obtaining the TRO, and thus the extension likely will be more difficult to obtain.  But for persons facing a threatened destruction of their business in retaliation for their assertion of Constitutional privacy rights, as purportedly is Ares here, the proactive move certainly seems to be at least a worthwhile strategy.  Experience suggests that the threat from ATF will be no greater because the owner chose this route than it would have been had he not.

Roger C. Wilson has represented a number of clients in connection with pending or threatened federal weapons- or firearms-related criminal charges.  He has obtained resolution of some of those cases after indictment; and in others, by becoming involved at an early stage, prior to indictment, he has succeeded in avoiding the bringing of such charges at all.  That these instances have involved consultations with and agreement by ATF agents does not mean that such a resolution always can be obtained in this way.  The California case well illustrates how other means can be used when necessary.

0 Comments

DEATH ROW EXONERATIONS

3/14/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
Two more recent stories--just the latest--to remind us of the fallibility of the criminal justice system even at the most serious level (the death penalty) where some might expect the safeguards to be most stringent.  Of course the implications are clear also for all "lower" levels of the system.

http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/man-exonerated-decades-death-row-video/#axzz2vxgZNZIQ

http://rt.com/usa/exonerated-death-row-texan-graves-522/


Roger
C. Wilson has represented a number of persons in criminal appeals, seeking relief after they had been convicted of crimes at trials when represented by other counsel.  He has obtained reductions of sentences, and releases of clients based on problems at trial, as well as outright reversals of convictions on appeal, even when the trial court had rejected a post-conviction motion for new trial based on the legal defects.
0 Comments

    BLOG

    Author

    The Roger C. Wilson
    Law Firm, PC

    Archives

    July 2018
    May 2018
    March 2014

    Categories

    All
    Constitutional Rights
    Criminal Appeals
    Criminal Defense
    Federal Crime
    Financial Crime
    Firearms Guns Weapons
    Securities Fraud
    White Collar Crime

    RSS Feed

    Older Archives